tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1219469017864992936.post80573909341220381..comments2023-04-16T05:57:32.377-07:00Comments on "Mo-View": The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (2009)Mohsenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10862725239683079735noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1219469017864992936.post-50234551369791955532009-11-20T11:15:38.743-08:002009-11-20T11:15:38.743-08:00I think you'll like the original version bette...I think you'll like the original version better (if you can forgive it's old technique). At least it's devoid of Scott's camera tricks.<br /><br />(And it contains a major subplot about a police on board the subway, which as you saw, Tony Scott took care of very early in his own version.)Mohsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10862725239683079735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1219469017864992936.post-23864120629479992952009-11-20T11:09:32.899-08:002009-11-20T11:09:32.899-08:00Although I like Tony scott's works, I'm on...Although I like Tony scott's works, I'm one of serious fans of Travolta & Washington, hijacking & hostage taking is my favorite topic & and I never left my seat through watching, I think the movie could have been worked on, better . I agree Washington's superiority on Travolta,moreover the real reasons for all of "Ryder" sadistic-homicidal behavior remained unclear till the end .Also as you said the sound & camera movements was too much .At first moments I got some similarity between it & "Inside man " but lack of that clever screenplay and obviously more violent. To me seems a good motivation for seeing the original version too.Maryamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10482965935605429771noreply@blogger.com